There are several ways the תורה/Torah is divided, and the systems we use today developed over time. The most familiar is the division into chapters and verses, which were introduced long after the Torah was composed. Torah scrolls preserve an older system of textual divisions, including paragraphs and sections, without the chapter and verse numbering we use today.
Another way of organizing the Torah is through the פרשיות/Parshiot, the portions read publicly in the synagogue. Historically, two principal systems of Torah reading developed: an annual cycle, traditionally associated with the Jewish communities of Babylonia, and a triennial cycle, associated with the Land of ישראל/Yisrael/Israel. The annual cycle, consisting of 54 portions, eventually became the dominant practice throughout the Jewish world. The longer Jerusalem tradition is often described as comprising 154 sections, although historical practice was more complex than a simple geographical division.
This history reminds us that even the ways we organize and read our sacred texts reflect centuries of Jewish tradition. It also raises an interesting question: how do the boundaries between our weekly portions shape the way we understand the Torah?
This week, we read פרשת נח/Parshat Noach, which begins at Genesis 6:9. Why does the portion begin in the middle of a chapter, when the story of Noah and the flood has already begun in the preceding verses?
The answer may lie in the connection between this week’s portion and last week’s. The flood does not begin with God’s decision to destroy the world. To understand that decision, we must first confront the grief and disappointment expressed at the end of last week’s portion:
When humankind began to increase on earth and daughters were born to them, the divine beings saw how pleasing the human women were and took wives from among those who delighted them. GOD said, “My breath shall not abide in humankind forever, since it too is flesh; let the days allowed them be one hundred and twenty years.” It was then, and later too, that the Nephilim appeared on earth—when divine beings cohabited with the human women, who bore them offspring. Such were the heroes of old, the men of renown. GOD saw how great was human wickedness on earth—how every plan devised by the human mind was nothing but evil all the time. And GOD regretted having made humankind on earth. With a sorrowful heart, GOD said, “I will blot out from the earth humankind whom I created—humans together with animals, creeping things, and birds of the sky; for I regret that I made them.” But Noah found favor with GOD. (בראשית ו:א–ח / Genesis 6:1–8)
These verses connect the flood to the story of creation itself. God does not simply observe humanity’s wickedness; God experiences regret and sorrow. The world that began with such promise has become corrupted. Before we can understand the flood, we must understand the heartbreak that precedes it.
In exploring this passage, I turned to the commentary of רש״י/Rashi and found a powerful teaching about the nature of God’s grief.
Commenting on the words “And GOD regretted having made humankind on earth. With a sorrowful heart,” Rashi explains that God mourned the failure of His handiwork. He then cites a teaching from מדרש רבה/Midrash Rabbah:
A gentile once asked Rabbi Joshua, the son of Korcha, “Do you not admit that the Holy One, blessed be He, knows what is to happen in the future?” He replied, “Yes.” The gentile retorted, “But is it not written, ‘and He was grieved in His heart’?” The rabbi asked him, “Have you ever had a son born to you?” The man replied, “Yes.” “And what did you do?” “I rejoiced and I made others rejoice also.” “But did you not know that he must die?” The man replied, “At the time of joy, let there be joy; at the time of mourning, let there be mourning.” The rabbi then said, “Such, too, is the way of the Holy One, blessed be He: although it was clear to Him that in the end men would sin and would be destroyed, He did not refrain from creating them for the sake of the righteous men who were to issue from them.” (Genesis Rabbah 27:4, as quoted by Rashi)
I find this teaching particularly powerful because it reframes the question. If God knew humanity would eventually fail, why create humanity at all? The Midrash answers with a question of its own: should the possibility of future pain prevent us from embracing the possibility of love?
A parent knows that a child will experience suffering, make mistakes, and eventually face death. Yet that knowledge does not diminish the joy of a child’s birth. The possibility of heartbreak does not erase the value of love.
So it is, the Midrash teaches, with God. Despite knowing that humanity would sin, God created the world for the sake of the goodness that would emerge from it. There would be righteous people, acts of kindness, and lives that made creation worthwhile.
Seen in this light, God’s grief becomes even more poignant. God is not simply disappointed in a failed creation but mourning the corruption of something precious. The sorrow reflects the investment of a creator who made a world filled with possibility and sees that possibility being squandered.
And yet, even in the midst of that grief, there is hope.
The final verse of last week’s portion tells us, almost quietly, that “Noah found favor with GOD.” After the sweeping condemnation of humanity, this small statement changes everything. Evil is not the whole story. Even when the world seems broken, goodness has not disappeared. Noah represents the possibility of a new beginning.
This is why the boundary between the two Torah portions matters. By beginning Parshat Noach at Genesis 6:9, we might miss the emotional foundation of the flood story if we do not look back. We must first encounter God’s grief to understand the destruction and recognize the possibility of goodness to understand the renewal that follows.
The story of Noah is not simply a story of punishment. It’s also a story about the pain of a relationship gone wrong, the persistence of goodness amid corruption, and the possibility of beginning again after devastating loss.
The Midrash invites us to see something deeply human in the divine: the willingness to love despite knowing love can lead to sorrow. Grief and hope are not opposites. Sometimes grief is evidence of how much something matters.
As we read Parshat Noach, we are invited to look beyond the floodwaters and consider the heart of the story. God mourns what has been lost, yet the story continues. Noah finds favor. Life begins again.
Perhaps this is one of the Torah’s most enduring lessons: the possibility that something can go wrong does not mean it was wrong to begin. Love remains worthwhile, goodness remains worth pursuing, and hope remains possible even after heartbreak. The story of creation does not end with God’s grief. It continues with the possibility of renewal.

